The Supreme Court in Arif Azim Co. Ltd. v. Micromax Informatics FZE clarified the distinction between the 'seat' and 'venue' in arbitration, reinforcing party autonomy and defining Dubai as the seat under UAE law, limiting Indian courts' jurisdiction.

In Rabindra Kumar Chhatoi v. State of Odisha, the Supreme Court ruled that the backyard of a private house does not qualify as a "public view" under Section 3(1)(x) of the SC/ST Act, discharging the appellant from charges of caste-based abuse and related IPC offences.

In Nalin Choksey v. Commissioner of Customs, the SC held that subsequent purchasers aren't liable for customs duty evasion by importers. It ruled that liability arises at importation, not ownership transfer, and set aside duties imposed on the appellant.

India’s trade deficit reflects growing domestic demand and structural challenges like energy reliance and tech imports. Strategic policies, export diversification, and investments in renewable energy and manufacturing aim to balance trade and drive sustainable growth.

The Supreme Court in State of NCT of Delhi v. Mohd. Jabir upheld procedural compliance under Section 50 NDPS Act, ruling that using "any" instead of "nearest" Gazetted Officer doesn’t invalidate the search if substantive rights aren’t prejudiced. Bail was revoked.

The Supreme Court's landmark judgment in Aureliano Fernandes v. State of Goa revitalizes the PoSH Act, addressing systemic lapses in workplace safety for women. By mandating compliance, transparency, and training, it paves the way for equitable and harassment-free workplaces.

The Doctrine of Legitimate Expectation ensures fairness in governance by protecting individuals' reasonable expectations arising from administrative promises or practices. Balancing trust and accountability, it prevents arbitrary actions while respecting public interest.

India’s evolving SBO rules spotlight transparency in corporate ownership. Recent cases, like LinkedIn India and Samsung Noida, highlight expanded interpretations of control and influence, aligning with global standards to enhance governance and prevent financial misconduct.

The Supreme Court in C. Selvarani v. The Special Secretary-cum-District Collector ruled that religious conversions made solely to avail reservation benefits are a "fraud on the Constitution." The decision emphasizes the need for genuine conversions to uphold social justice.

The inherent powers of courts under CPC (Sections 148–153, esp. Section 151) ensure justice by addressing procedural gaps, safeguarding equity, and preventing abuse while respecting statutory limits.

The SC upheld the UP Madarsa Act, balancing state regulation with minority rights, emphasizing secularism as coexistence, not negation, ensuring quality education without infringing religious freedoms.

Hart’s positivism argues that law is valid through procedural origins, independent of morality. Fuller’s natural law contends that ethical principles are essential to law’s legitimacy and social respect.

The Supreme Court’s recent ruling restored Aligarh Muslim University’s minority status, overturning a 1967 decision. This landmark judgment redefines Article 30 protections for minority institutions in India.

The Competition Act, 2002 regulates mergers and acquisitions to prevent monopolies, fostering market fairness. The CCI balances growth with competition, ensuring consumer welfare and economic efficiency.

Appeals in the Indian Code of Civil Procedure enable dissatisfied parties to seek higher court review of lower court judgments, ensuring fairness. They must be statutory, pertain to judicial decrees, and involve aggrieved parties.

Greenwashing misleads consumers with false eco-friendly claims, harming both trust and real sustainability. High-profile cases show why clear regulations and transparency are crucial for accountability.

Pleadings are written statements in civil cases outlining facts, claims, and defenses. They help clarify issues, guide the court, and ensure transparency, forming the basis for an organized and fair trial.

The Central Consumer Protection Council (CCPC) in India safeguards consumer rights, promotes fair practices, and advises on policies. It fosters consumer safety, education, and ethical business practices nationwide.

The doctrines of Res-Judicata and Res-Sub Judice are essential in preventing redundant litigation and ensuring judicial efficiency. Res-Judicata, under Section 11 of the CPC, bars re-litigation of an issue already settled between the same parties. In contrast, Res-Sub Judice, under Section 10, preve

Negligence in tort law addresses failures to exercise reasonable care, leading to harm. Established by the landmark case Donoghue v. Stevenson, which introduced the “neighbor principle,” negligence requires proof of duty, breach, causation, and damages. In India, cases like Indian Medical Associatio

The Public Liability Insurance Act, 1991, safeguards individuals and communities from the risks of hazardous industrial activities. Prompted by the Bhopal Gas Tragedy, this Act mandates insurance coverage for industries handling dangerous substances, ensuring swift compensation for victims of indust

Summons and discovery are essential components of civil litigation that ensure fairness and transparency in the legal process. A summons is a formal notice issued to inform a party of legal action and compel their presence in court. Discovery, on the other hand, facilitates the exchange of relevant

Civil litigation involves identifying the correct parties, framing the suit properly, and drafting precise pleadings. Parties to a suit, such as plaintiffs and defendants, must have a direct interest in the dispute. Proper framing of the suit ensures all claims and parties are aligned, avoiding proc

The Hindu Marriage Act of 1955 codified marriage and divorce among Hindus, outlining key grounds such as cruelty, adultery, desertion, and mental disorder. Sections 13 and 13B provide a structured legal basis for individuals seeking divorce, ensuring protection for both parties. Landmark cases like

In Indian law, a “Contract of Sale” involves the immediate transfer of ownership of goods for a price, while a “Contract for Sale” refers to an agreement to transfer ownership at a future date, contingent on specific conditions. The key difference lies in the timing of the ownership transfer and the