LITT
Try LITT free
GLAS Trust v. BYJU Raveendran: The Supreme Court Case That Closed the Section 12A Door
An edtech unicorn, $1.2 billion in cross-border debt, and a 61-page Supreme Court judgment that tightened Section 12A withdrawals. Section 12A withdrawals fell from 296 in 2022 to 59 in 2024.
Lalit Kumar Jain v. Union of India: When Personal Guarantors Came Onshore
A 21 May 2021 Supreme Court judgment upheld India's personal-guarantor IBC regime. Before it, 29 cases in 2019. After it, 547 in 2022. The story of the IBC's second front.
The Supreme Court's IBC Docket: 643 Orders Analysed (2017-2024)
643 Supreme Court orders in eight years. The apex court handles 0.4% of all IBC volume but writes the doctrine for everyone else. A close reading.
The 25 Supreme Court Cases That Shaped India's IBC Jurisprudence
Mobilox to GLAS Trust — the precedent backbone of India's insolvency law, ranked by citation count across 25,106 orders. Five Supreme Court rulings account for over 1,400 citations.
Kalyani Transco v. Bhushan Power: India's Longest-Running IBC Saga in the Supreme Court
Civil Appeal No. 1808 of 2020 has produced more Supreme Court orders than any other IBC matter in the eight-year corpus — twenty-eight of them, four years of \"early hearing\" applications, and the doctrine that never landed.
Red Flagged: Why the Supreme Court Panel Just Told the Centre to Scrap the 2026 Transgender Amendment Bill
The Supreme Court’s Red Line on Environmental Oversight
In T.N. Godavarman case, SC sets constitutional boundary: Govt can't dissolve CEC sans court nod. This judicially born, statutorily backed panel upholds unbiased eco-monitoring against exec erosion.
Case Study: The State of Madhya Pradesh v. Balveer Singh
Transferred Malice in Criminal Law: The Doctrine and Its Judicial Interpretation
The doctrine of transferred malice holds that intent to harm one person applies even if another is harmed instead. Recognized under Section 301 IPC (now Section 102 BNS), it ensures criminal liability despite unintended victims.
The Supreme Court’s landmark judgment in Arif Azim Co. Ltd. v. Micromax Informatics FZE: A Deep Dive into the Distinction between 'Seat' and 'Venue' in International Arbitration
The Supreme Court in Arif Azim Co. Ltd. v. Micromax Informatics FZE clarified the distinction between the 'seat' and 'venue' in arbitration, reinforcing party autonomy and defining Dubai as the seat under UAE law, limiting Indian courts' jurisdiction.