Nishant Singh Rawat, a PhD scholar in law at the University of Delhi with degrees in Physics, Law, and LL.M., has 4 years of teaching experience. Passionate about legal philosophy and governance.
In Soman v. State of Kerala (2012), the Supreme Court of India emphasized that sentencing should be fair, just, and proportionate, considering the nature of the crime, the circumstances of the offender, and the impact on the victim. The Court underscored that sentencing in criminal cases must strike
Case Study: Bayer Corporation v. Union of India (2014)
The Bayer Corporation v. Union of India case emphasizes the legal framework for granting compulsory licenses under the Indian Patents Act, 1970, particularly to ensure that essential medicines are accessible at affordable prices. The Bombay High Court upheld the Controller’s decision to grant a comp
Case Study: Ram Jankijee Deities and Ors. v. State of Bihar and Ors.
In the case Ram Jankijee Deities and Ors. v. State of Bihar and Ors. (AIR 1999 SC 2131), the Supreme Court of India recognized Hindu deities ‘Ram Jankiji’ and ‘Raja Rani’ as separate juristic entities capable of holding property. The Court ruled that each deity is entitled to individual grants and e
In S. Khushboo v. Kanniammal and Anr., the Supreme Court of India, upheld the freedom of speech and expression by dismissing multiple criminal defamation suits against actress Khushboo for her remarks on pre-marital sex. The court emphasized that expressing opinions on societal issues is protected u
Case Study: Subhra Mukherjee & Anr. v. Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. & Ors.
This case deals with the bogus and malafide transfer of corporate property in the name of wives of directors to avoid the vesting of the property in Central Government under Section 3(1) of the Coal Mines (Nationalisation) Act, 1973
In this case, the Kerala High Court overturned a conviction under Section 15(2) of the POCSO Act, 2012, and Section 67(B)(b) of the IT Act, 2000. The court found no evidence that the accused intentionally downloaded or distributed child pornographic material, leading to his discharge.
Case Study: Dev Kishan and Ors v. Ram Kishan and Ors.
In the case of Dev Kishan & Ors v. Ram Kishan and Ors, disputes arose over property transactions within a joint Hindu family. The plaintiffs challenged the validity of transactions conducted by the family’s manager, Madan Lal, who sold properties to Kishan Lal, alleging they were conducted without l
Case Study: State of UP & Anr. v. Radhey Shyam Rai
In this case Supreme Court of India interpreted the meaning of ‘state’ under Article 12 and its applicability to a cooperative society that falls under preview of U.P Ganna Kisan Sansthan
Case Study: Smt. S. Vanitha v. The Deputy Commissioner, Bengaluru Urban District & Ors.
In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court of India upheld the right of a wife to a shared household under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, even in the face of a decree obtained by her in-laws under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007. The ca
Case Study: Mackinnon Mackenzie & co. pvt. ltd. v. Ibrahim Mahommed Issak
In a pivotal case, the Supreme Court of India examined the relationship between employment and accidents under the Workmen’s Compensation Act, 1923. The court ruled that there must be a causal relationship between the accident and the employment for compensation claims to be valid.
Understanding Anuradha Bhasin v. Union of India: The Kashmir Internet Shut-down case
This case also boiled around to discover as to what is more important, liberty or security? And to strike a balance between liberty and security issues to an extent that fundamental rights are secured and enjoyed in the most appropriate way.
“The Doctrine of Notional Extension, a cornerstone of social security, broadens the concept of employment beyond its physical boundaries. It mandates compensation for workers in case of an accident during their employment, regardless of the location. This doctrine, which has shaped laws regarding em