What are the Legal Remedies for Copyright Infringement, from Piracy to Penalties?

Introduction

Copyright law in India, governed by the Copyright Act of 1957, provides creators with exclusive rights to their works, including the right to reproduce, distribute, and display their works. However, in the digital era, the rapid growth of the internet has led to significant challenges in enforcing copyright. Unauthorized reproduction and distribution of copyrighted works have become easier, raising questions about the effectiveness of copyright protection and the legal remedies available to combat infringement. 

When does Copyright Infringement Occur?

Infringement of copyright occurs when a person uses a copyrighted work without authorization from the owner, in violation of the exclusive rights granted to the copyright holder. Under Section 51 of the Copyright Act, 1957[1], copyright is infringed when a person:

1. Uses the work without a license from the owner or in violation of the terms of a license.
2. Permits a place to be used for communicating the work to the public, knowing or having reasonable grounds to believe that it will infringe copyright.
3. Makes or distributes copies of the work for commercial gain or offers it for sale, hire, or public display.

Notably, the act of copying substantial parts of a copyrighted work, even if not verbatim, can lead to infringement if the resemblances are significant enough to indicate a copy. This was established in the case of R.G. Anand v. Delux Films[2], where the Supreme Court held that even an adaptation or re-creation of a work that retains significant similarities can constitute infringement. 

Remedies for Copyright Infringement

The Copyright Act of 1957 offers several remedies for copyright owners to address infringement. These remedies are primarily divided into civil, criminal, and administrative categories, each designed to provide effective recourse for infringement. 

1. Civil Remedies

Civil remedies for copyright infringement are outlined under Sections 54 to 62[3] of the Copyright Act. The copyright owner has the right to seek an injunction, damages, account of profits, or any other remedy available under law.

• Injunction: The act grants the court the power to issue an injunction to restrain the defendant from further infringing the copyright.
• Damages and Accounts of Profits: The court may order the defendant to pay damages for the loss suffered by the copyright owner or the profits made by the defendant from the infringement. In Fateh Singh Mehta v. OP Singhal[4], the court held that the production of an unauthorised reproduction of a literary work amounted to infringement.
• Destruction of Infringing Copies: Under the act, the court may order the destruction or delivery of the infringing copies.

In certain cases, the defendant can argue that they were unaware of the existence of the copyright, leading to a reduction in the remedies available, such as limiting the relief to an injunction and profits made by the defendant from the infringing work.

2. Criminal Remedies

The Copyright Act also provides criminal remedies under Sections 63 to 66[5] to deter and punish deliberate infringements. These provisions include:

• Imprisonment and Fines: The Act mandates imprisonment for a minimum of six months and up to three years for those found guilty of infringing copyright, along with a fine between ₹50,000 and ₹200,000.
• Seizure of Infringing Copies: The court may order the seizure of pirated copies, and the defendant may be required to deliver these to the copyright owner.
• Infringement of Technological Protection Measures: Under Section 65A[6], circumvention of technological measures that protect a copyrighted work can lead to a penalty of up to two years in prison and a monetary fine.

The case of Indian Performing Right Society Ltd. v. Sanjay Dalia[7] underscored the importance of criminal actions in deterring piracy by holding the defendant criminally liable for unauthorized use of music tracks.

3. Administrative Remedies

Administrative remedies, primarily under Section 53[8], provide measures such as the destruction of pirated goods. The Act allows the government to take steps to curb the import of pirated copies into the country.

• Ban on Import of Infringing Copies: Section 53[9] empowers the government to issue orders for the seizure and destruction of pirated works and to prevent the import of such copies into India. This provision aims to prevent the circulation of infringing works in the market and ensures that copyright owners have their legal rights respected.

4. Remedies for Online Infringement

The growth of the internet has brought new challenges to copyright enforcement. The Copyright (Amendment) Act of 2012 introduced provisions to deal with online infringement, particularly regarding temporary or incidental storage of copyrighted works.

The Copyright (Amendment) Act of 2012 introduced provisions addressing copyright infringement in the digital and internet space. Section 52(1)(b)[10] allows temporary or incidental storage of a work for electronic transmission or public communication without constituting copyright infringement. Section 52(1)(c)[11] ensures that transient or incidental storage for providing electronic links or access is not an infringement unless the person responsible is aware of or reasonably believes the storage to be infringing. If a copyright holder complains, the responsible party must refrain from providing access to the infringing content for 21 days, unless a court order instructs otherwise. The 2012 amendment makes it clear that all copyright provisions apply equally to digital and traditional media, ensuring that online platforms are subject to the same penalties for copyright infringement. 

International Protection and Remedies

International treaties such as the Berne Convention and TRIPS Agreement provide a framework for enforcing copyright across borders. These agreements oblige member countries to establish procedures for judicial review, the awarding of damages, and the destruction of infringing goods.

TRIPS (Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights) mandates that WTO member countries must provide effective remedies for copyright infringement, including injunctions, damages, and the destruction of pirated goods.

The WIPO Copyright Treaty (1996) specifically addresses the challenges posed by digital media, including provisions on the protection of technological measures and rights management information, thereby assisting copyright owners in the digital age. 

Preventive Measures for Copyright Protection

Although no remedy can prevent infringement entirely, copyright owners are encouraged to adopt preventive measures to protect their works. These include:

1. Registration: Registering copyright works with the Copyright Office provides a legal basis for enforcement and is essential when pursuing civil remedies.
2. Copyright Notices: Displaying a copyright notice on works serves as a deterrent against unauthorized use.
3. Monitoring and Enforcement: Copyright owners should actively monitor the use of their works and take action against repeat infringers.
4. Licensing Agreements: Proper licensing arrangements help control the distribution and use of copyrighted works, reducing the risk of infringement.

Conclusion

The remedies for copyright infringement under the Indian Copyright Act of 1957 are robust, encompassing civil, criminal, and administrative measures. The expansion of digital media and internet platforms has necessitated specific provisions to address online infringement, which are now incorporated in the law. Although challenges remain in enforcing copyright, especially in the online domain, the legal remedies available under Indian law provide a strong framework for copyright owners to protect their works. Furthermore, international treaties such as the Berne Convention and TRIPS ensure that copyright protection and enforcement are not limited by national borders, offering a comprehensive approach to combat infringement globally.

[1] The Copyright Act, 1957, s. 51.

[2] AIR 1978 SUPREME COURT 1613.

[3] The Copyright Act, 1957, ss. 54 – 62.

[4] AIR 1990 RAJ 8.

[5] The Copyright Act, 1957, ss. 63 – 66.

[6] Id. at s. 65A.

[7] AIR 2015 SUPREME COURT 3479.

[8] The Copyright Act, 1957, s. 53.

[9] Ibid.

[10] The Copyright Act, 1957, s. 52(1)(b).

[11] Id. at s. 52(1)(c).

Download