The freedom of the press in India, implicit under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution, is vital for democracy. While it empowers open dialogue, it is subject to reasonable restrictions under Article 19(2) to ensure public order, security, and individual rights.

This article examines the intricate balance between freedom of speech and judicial authority in India, focusing on contempt of court laws. It highlights the interplay of constitutional rights, judicial powers, and the need for reforms to align with democratic principles.

Film censorship in India seeks to balance artistic freedom with societal norms. While the Constitution guarantees freedom of speech, it allows restrictions in the interest of public order, decency, and morality, with the CBFC acting as a regulatory body for this purpose.

Compelled speech in India challenges the balance between freedom of expression under Article 19(1)(a) and state-imposed mandates. Courts cautiously limit such mandates to public interest under Article 19(2).