 
      
            case-study
            
          
        Case Study: Tecnicas Medioambientales Tacmed S.A. (Tecmed) v. Mexico
    The Tecmed v. Mexico case (ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/00/2) established that politically motivated regulatory actions can constitute expropriation. The tribunal ruled that Mexico’s refusal to renew a landfill permit violated investor protections, awarding $5.5M in damages.
  
   
      
          case-study
        
      
      Case Study: Tecnicas Medioambientales Tacmed S.A. (Tecmed) v. Mexico
    
    
      The Tecmed v. Mexico case (ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/00/2) established that politically motivated regulatory actions can constitute expropriation. The tribunal ruled that Mexico’s refusal to renew a landfill permit violated investor protections, awarding $5.5M in damages.
    
     
      
          lex-o-pedia
        
      
      What is the role of the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID)?
    
    
      The International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) provides a neutral forum for resolving disputes between states and foreign investors. Established in 1966 under the ICSID Convention, it ensures impartial arbitration and conciliation, fostering investment stability.
    
     
      
          columns
        
      
      Impact of International Investment Law on developing countries
    
    
      International investment law shapes economic policies in developing nations by attracting FDI while restricting regulatory sovereignty. While it fosters growth, it raises concerns over investor-state disputes, financial burdens, and environmental sustainability.
    
     
      
          lex-o-pedia
        
      
      What is Expropriation under International Investment Laws?
    
    
      Expropriation in international investment law is the compulsory taking of foreign investors' assets by a host state, balancing sovereign rights with investment protection. It includes direct and indirect forms, requiring fair compensation and due process.
    
     
      
          lex-o-pedia
        
      
      What is the Doctrine of Regulatory Taking in International Investment Law?
    
    
      The regulatory taking doctrine in international investment law mandates compensation when state regulations significantly impact investments, even without formal expropriation, balancing sovereign regulation and investor protection.
    
     
      
          case-study
        
      
      Case Study: Saipem S.p.A. v. The People’s Republic of Bangladesh
    
    
      In Saipem S.p.A. v. Bangladesh, ICSID ruled that judicial interference leading to loss of contractual rights is indirect expropriation. This case broadened protection for foreign investors under international investment law.
    
     
      
          lex-o-pedia
        
      
      What is Most-Favoured-Nation (MFN) Treatment in Investment Treaties?
    
    
      Most-Favoured-Nation (MFN) treatment ensures foreign investors receive treatment no less favorable than investors from other nations. While promoting non-discrimination, its application in dispute resolution and substantive protections remains debated in investment law.
    
     
      
          lex-o-pedia
        
      
      What is International Investment Law?
    
    
      International investment law governs foreign investments, balancing investor rights with state regulatory powers. It involves IIAs, arbitration mechanisms, and standards like fair treatment and non-discrimination, while addressing public policy and sovereignty challenges.