Citation: AIR 2004 SC 1284 Date of Judgement: 10th December,

Citation: AIR 1987 SC 1109 Date Of Judgement: 11th February,

Citations: 1967 Indlaw PAT 51, AIR 1968 PAT 190 Date

Right to Layoff and Compensation of Workers. Citation: AIR 1976

Citation: Transfer Petition (Civil) 291 Day of Judgement: 14th February

Citation: AIR 1960 Cal 438 Date of Judgement: 18th December,

Citation: 1935 Indlaw MUM 7, [1935] 3 ITR 367 Date

At the same time, she also filed an application under Section 125 of Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter referred to as Code).

Bhaurao Shankar Lokhande (Appellant No. 1) married to Indubai in the year 1956.

Dismissed the revision petition.

Chand Patel/Appellant was married to Mustaq Bee. With the consent of his wife, he married to her sister, Bismillah Begum/Respondent No.1 in 1993, and had a daughter from her, Tehman bano/ Respondent No.2 in 1995.

The essence of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000, and the Rules framed thereunder in 2007, is restorative and not retributive, providing for rehabilitation and re- integration of children in conflict with law into mainstream society.

Whether the court below failed to apply the principle laid down in Section 13(1-A) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955?

Citations: 2008 Indlaw DEL 763, 2008 (150) DLT 769, 2008

Citation: 2007 Indlaw DEL 2579, 2007 (2) ILR(Del) 1329 Date

The High Court dismissed the petition and had ordered the investigating report to be submitted within 3 months from the date of receipt of this order to the Metropolitan Magistrate.

Citation: AIR 1968 SC 1018 Date of Judgement: 8th February,

This article throws light on the case of Babui Panmato Kuer v. Ram Agya Singh by stating all the facts, background and key law positions established in the case.

This article states the facts, issues and the judgement of the Saiyid Rashid Ahmad v. Mussammat Anisa Khatun case.

This article tells about the case Archana v. Dy Director of Consolidation, Amroha & amp; Ors.

The Right to live is a fundamental right guaranteed under Art 21 of the Constitution and guarantees a citizen to live in pollution-free water and air.

Citation: AIR 2002 MP 263 Date of Judgment: 17th May,

Guramma Bhratar Chanbasappa Deshmukh and Another v. Malappa

Addagada Raghavamma and Another v. Addagada Chenchamma and Another

A landmark judgment that established the law on price parallelism for oligopolies that price parallelism by itself is not conclusive of an arrangement of bid-rigging.