Wife, Daughter of Rana Kapoor Granted Interim Bail by Special CBI Court in Yes Bank Scam Case

A Special Court in Mumbai has granted interim bail to

Wife, Daughter of Rana Kapoor Granted Interim Bail by Special CBI Court in Yes Bank Scam Case

A Special Court in Mumbai has granted interim bail to Yes Bank founder Rana Kapoor’s wife, Bindu Kapoor and daughter Radha Kapoor in the corruption cases related to Dewan Housing Financial Limited (DHFL).

The Session Judge SU Wadegaonkar granted the interim bail to the applicants keeping in view the judgement of the Supreme Court in the case of Aman Preet Singh v. CBI, that if a person is accused in a non-bailable offence and his custody was not required during the period of investigation, then it is appropriate that such an accused be released on bail.

The CBI had registered an FIR in 2020 against DHFL promoters and Kapoor for offences under the Prevention of Corruption Act.

The CBI filed its primary charge sheet wherein Rana Kapoor and his other daughter, Roshini Kapoor name was mentioned as accused.

Later, in August 2021, CBI filed a supplementary charge sheet which named Bindu and Radha Kapoor as accused. However, the two had not been arrested.

On the summons issued by the Special CBI Court, the two applicants appeared on September 4, 2021.

The counsel appearing for the applicants prayed for the bail on the ground that the charge sheet had been filed in the case without their custody, also the court had already exercised the discretion of issuing summons to his clients, clearly showing that there was no need to arrest them.

The court allowed the request of the Public Prosecutor for time to file a reply to the application of bail. While granting interim bail to the applicants and posted the matter for hearing on 8 September 2021.

Join Us as a Campus Ambassador for Legal Wires and Lex Live!
Join Us as a Campus Ambassador for Legal Wires and Lex Live!
Join Us as a Campus Ambassador for Legal Wires & Lex Live! Lead initiatives, build Legal AI Societies, and connect with peers and professionals. https://forms.gle/sFNBHhiquZSGemqw9
"No Suits to Be Registered and No Orders Passed Until Further Directions": Supreme Court Intervenes in Places of Worship Act Case
"No Suits to Be Registered and No Orders Passed Until Further Directions": Supreme Court Intervenes in Places of Worship Act Case
The Supreme Court halts the registration of new suits against places of worship and bars survey orders in pending cases, while hearing petitions challenging the Places of Worship Act, 1991.
"Mere Harassment Not Enough for Suicide Abetment Conviction": Supreme Court Clarifies Legal Standards
"Mere Harassment Not Enough for Suicide Abetment Conviction": Supreme Court Clarifies Legal Standards
The Supreme Court rules that harassment alone isn't enough to convict someone of abetment to suicide. It requires evidence of direct action or incitement by the accused.
Or
Powered by Lit Law
New Chat
Sources

Ask Lit Law