Victim In West Bengal Governor Sexual Harassment Case Moves To Supreme Court

A former employee of West Bengal Raj Bhavan, alleging sexual harassment by the State’s Governor, CV Ananda Bose, has petitioned the Supreme Court. The petition challenges the Governor’s immunity from criminal prosecution under Article 361 of the Constitution, arguing that it shouldn’t preclude polic

Victim In West Bengal Governor Sexual Harassment Case Moves To Supreme Court

A former employee of West Bengal Raj Bhavan, who accused the State’s Governor, CV Ananda Bose, of sexual harassment, has moved a petition in the Supreme Court. The petition challenges the Governor’s claim of immunity from criminal prosecution under Article 361 of the Constitution.

The petition argues that Article 361 does not prevent a police investigation against the Governor. She contended that the Governor cannot claim blanket immunity for criminal acts, asserting that allowing such immunity would force her to wait until the Governor leaves office to initiate the trial, which she deems unreasonable and a violation of her fundamental rights.

This court has to decide whether a victim like the Petitioner can be rendered remediless, with the only option being to wait for the accused to demit his office, which delay will then be inexplainable during the trial, and render the entire procedure a mere lip service, without any justice to the victim herein,” the plea said.

Article 361 of the Indian Constitution grants immunity to Governors of States, shielding them from legal proceedings for actions taken in the course of their official duties. This protection is designed to ensure their ability to carry out their responsibilities without fear of interference from courts or legal challenges. Additionally, it includes safeguards against arrest during their tenure, aiming to uphold the independence and effective functioning of their office.

According to the victim’s complaint, the Governor called her on April 24 and May 2 under the false pretence of offering a better job, only to sexually harass her within the Raj Bhavan premises during working hours.

Furthermore, the petitioner has requested safeguards for her and her family’s safety, compensation for harm to her reputation, and instructions for the State Police to initiate an investigation into the issue.

"This Country Will Function As Per the Wishes of the Majority”: Justice Yadav’s Controversial Remarks at VHP Event
"This Country Will Function As Per the Wishes of the Majority”: Justice Yadav’s Controversial Remarks at VHP Event
Justice Shekhar Yadav advocates for a Uniform Civil Code and majority rule, but his remarks on gender issues and Muslim practices raise concerns about his understanding of secularism.
Allahabad HC sitting Judge Justice Yadav Talks Uniform Civil Code, Religious Conversion at VHP Event
Allahabad HC sitting Judge Justice Yadav Talks Uniform Civil Code, Religious Conversion at VHP Event
Justice Shekhar Kumar Yadav delivers a lecture on Uniform Civil Code, highlighting its constitutional necessity. The event also discusses Waqf Board Act and religious conversions.
“Secularism Was Not Given Its Due”: Justice Nariman Critiques Supreme Court’s Babri Masjid Verdict
“Secularism Was Not Given Its Due”: Justice Nariman Critiques Supreme Court’s Babri Masjid Verdict
Justice Nariman critiques the Babri Masjid verdict, calling it a travesty of justice for not upholding secularism. He emphasizes the need for tolerance and stronger laws to preserve India’s secularism.
Powered by Lit Law
New Chat
Sources

Ask Lit Law