“Uttar Pradesh’s Controversial Anti-Conversion Bill: What’s New and Who’s Affected?”

The Uttar Pradesh Vidhan Sabha has recently passed the Unlawful Conversion of Religion (Amendment) Bill, 2024, marking a significant shift in the state’s approach to religious conversions. The bill introduces harsh penalties, including life imprisonment for the most severe cases, such as deceptive m

“Uttar Pradesh’s Controversial Anti-Conversion Bill: What’s New and Who’s Affected?”

On Tuesday, the Uttar Pradesh Vidhan Sabha passed the Uttar Pradesh Unlawful Conversion of Religion (Amendment) Bill, 2024. This new legislation intensifies penalties for unlawful religious conversions, particularly those involving marriage under false pretenses. The amended law now includes provisions for life imprisonment in the most severe cases. The bill has sparked controversy, with opposition parties criticizing it as an attempt to distract from other issues through communal politics.

Key Provisions of the Amendment:

  • Maximum Punishment: Life imprisonment for marrying under false pretenses and illegally converting a woman’s religion.
  • Other Offenses: Up to 20 years of imprisonment or life imprisonment for:
    • Threatening or attacking individuals for conversion.
    • Marrying or promising marriage for conversion.
    • Conspiring or trafficking for conversion.
  • FIR Registration: Any person can now register a First Information Report (FIR) in cases of unlawful conversion. Previously, under the Unlawful Conversion Act, 2021, only the victim, her parents, or siblings could file a complaint.
  • Court Proceedings: Cases will be tried only in Sessions Courts, and bail pleas will not be considered without the involvement of the public prosecutor.
  • Non-Bailable Offenses: All crimes under the amended Act are non-bailable.

Opposition Response:

  • Samajwadi Party (SP):
    • Akhilesh Yadav accused the BJP government of using communal politics to distract from other issues.
  • Congress Party:
    • Shahnawaz Alam criticized the bill as an extension of the BJP’s agenda of hatred.
    • Questioned the effectiveness of the previous Act and the government’s commitment to punishing the guilty.
    • Linked the bill’s timing to recent controversies, suggesting it aims to polarize the environment.
US to Exit WHO in 12 Months, Trump Cites Unfair Contributions Citing COVID-19 and Funding Issues
Legal Wires
US to Exit WHO in 12 Months, Trump Cites Unfair Contributions Citing COVID-19 and Funding Issues
President Trump has signed an executive order to withdraw the US from the WHO, citing COVID-19 mismanagement and financial burden. The exit, set for 12 months, will halt US funding, sparking global concerns.
Public Interest at Risk: SC Flags Issues in Loan Sanctions Without Proper Title Verification RBI to Establish Uniform Guidelines
Legal Wires
Public Interest at Risk: SC Flags Issues in Loan Sanctions Without Proper Title Verification RBI to Establish Uniform Guidelines
The Supreme Court flagged the issue of banks sanctioning loans without proper title search reports, directing the RBI to develop a standard framework and hold erring bank officials accountable.
SC: Specific Performance Suits Stay Alive Post-Decree, Courts Retain Powers
Legal Wires
SC: Specific Performance Suits Stay Alive Post-Decree, Courts Retain Powers
The Supreme Court ruled that specific performance suits don't end with a decree; courts retain power under Section 28 to modify, extend deadlines, or annul decrees post-judgment.
Or
Powered by Lit Law
New Chat
Sources
No Sources Available
Ask AI