Supreme Court Questions Union on Implementation of Ration Card Orders for Over 28 Crore Migrant Workers

The Supreme Court has directed the Union of India to file a detailed affidavit on the compliance with its earlier orders concerning the distribution of ration cards to migrant workers. This comes after repeated directions issued during the COVID-19 pandemic, addressing the need for food security amo

Supreme Court Questions Union on Implementation of Ration Card Orders for Over 28 Crore Migrant Workers

In a significant development, the Supreme Court of India has called upon the Union of India to submit a comprehensive affidavit addressing whether the directions issued in suo moto proceedings regarding the distribution of ration cards to migrant workers and unskilled laborers have been fully complied with. This directive came on September 2, 2024, during a hearing concerning the compliance with previous orders that were crucial in safeguarding the rights of these vulnerable groups during the COVID-19 pandemic. The Court’s scrutiny is rooted in its 2020 initiative, which aimed to ensure food security for migrant laborers who faced severe hardships during the lockdowns.

Background of the Case:

  • The Supreme Court had taken suo motu cognizance of the hardships faced by migrant laborers during the COVID-19 lockdown on May 26, 2020.
  • The Court issued multiple orders for the transportation of migrant laborers back to their native places and the provision of dry rations and cooked meals to those stranded.
  • On June 26, 2021, a bench of Justices Ashok Bhushan and M.R. Shah directed the States and Union Territories to implement the One Nation One Ration Card scheme and provide dry rations to those not covered under the National Food Security Act, 2013 (NFSA).

Key Orders and Directives:

  1. Portal Development: The Central Government was directed to develop a portal for the registration of unorganized laborers/migrant workers, with a deadline of July 31, 2021.
  2. Foodgrain Distribution: The Centre was instructed to distribute additional foodgrains as demanded by States for migrant laborers.
  3. Ration Scheme Implementation: States were ordered to implement schemes for dry ration distribution by July 31, 2021, and to continue these schemes as long as the pandemic persisted.
  4. One Nation One Ration Card: States were mandated to implement this scheme by July 31, 2021.
  5. Population Re-determination: The Centre was asked to re-determine the population covered under the NFSA.
  6. Contractor Registration: States/UTs were directed to ensure the registration of all establishments and contractors to monitor migrant laborers.
  7. Community Kitchens: States/UTs were ordered to run community kitchens at prominent locations to feed those without means during the pandemic.

SC’s Response to Migrant Crisis:

  • The application was heard by a bench of Justices C.T. Ravikumar and Sanjay Karol.
  • Advocate Prashant Bhushan accused the Union Government of contempt for non-compliance with the Court’s orders, which was countered by the Court as being beyond the scope of the current proceedings.
  • Justice Ravikumar clarified that the matter was not a contempt petition but a miscellaneous application, urging a focus on the specific issues at hand.
  • Bhushan argued that the Union of India had failed to issue ration cards based on the 2021 census, affecting over 10.2 crore people.
  • The Court, however, emphasized that the matter might be closed post-pandemic, with Justice Karol questioning the need to expand the scope of the petition further.
  • Despite Bhushan’s objections, the Court asked Additional Solicitor General Aishwarya Bhati to submit an affidavit detailing the steps taken by the Union in compliance with the orders and whether further actions were necessary.

Subsequent Developments:

  • The Court has previously directed the Union and State governments to report on the distribution of ration cards to the 28.55 crore migrant/unorganized workers registered on the E-Shram portal.
  • In April 2023, directions were given to ensure that all migrant or unorganized workers without ration cards but registered on the E-Shram portal receive them within three months.

IN RE PROBLEMS AND MISERIES OF MIGRANT LABOURERS MA 94/2022 in SMW© No. 6/2020

New Data Protection Rules: Focus on Children’s Privacy and Cross-Border Data Transfers
New Data Protection Rules: Focus on Children’s Privacy and Cross-Border Data Transfers
The Draft Digital Personal Data Protection Rules, 2023, propose mandatory parental consent for processing children’s data by platforms like social media, gaming, and e-commerce. Public feedback is invited by February 18, 2025.
SC Quashes Chargesheet in Workplace Misconduct Case, Emphasizes Clear Evidence
SC Quashes Chargesheet in Workplace Misconduct Case, Emphasizes Clear Evidence
The Supreme Court quashed proceedings under Sections 354 and 506 IPC, holding that vague statements cannot establish mens rea or criminal intent. The Court emphasized that clear evidence is necessary to prove intent to outrage modesty or intimidate.
Valid Execution of Will Does Not Guarantee Its Genuineness: Supreme Court
Valid Execution of Will Does Not Guarantee Its Genuineness: Supreme Court
The Supreme Court clarified that proving the valid execution of a Will does not automatically establish its genuineness. It emphasized that Courts must ensure all suspicious circumstances are adequately explained by the propounder before acting on the Will.
Or
Powered by Lit Law
New Chat
Sources
No Sources Available
Ask AI