South Korean Court Issues Arrest Warrant for Impeached President Yoon Suk-yeol

South Korea’s court has issued an arrest warrant for impeached President Yoon Suk-yeol over his martial law decree, marking a historic first. Yoon faces charges of insurrection and abuse of power.

South Korean Court Issues Arrest Warrant for Impeached President Yoon Suk-yeol

In a historic first for South Korea, a court has issued an arrest warrant for impeached President Yoon Suk-yeol over his brief imposition of martial law on December 3, 2024. The warrant, granted by the Seoul Western District Court on Tuesday, marks an unprecedented step in the nation's legal and political history. President Yoon faces charges of insurrection and abuse of power, crimes punishable by life imprisonment or even the death penalty. The decision comes amid a deepening leadership crisis in South Korea, with the nation’s political stability hanging in the balance.


Court’s Decision and Execution Timeline

  • The Joint Investigation Headquarters, comprising officials from the Corruption Investigation Office for High-ranking Officials (CIO), police, and the defense ministry, sought and obtained the arrest warrant.
  • According to Oh Dong-woon, the head of the CIO, the warrant will be executed “within the valid period,” which expires next Monday.
  • Oh warned“Anyone obstructing the execution of the warrant, such as setting up barricades or resisting investigators, will face prosecution.”
  • Yoon’s security detail has previously blocked investigators from executing search warrants at the presidential office compound and his residence.
  • The Presidential Security Service (PSS) stated it would handle the warrant in compliance with legal processes, though Yoon’s legal team has labeled the warrant “illegal and invalid.”
  • Yoon’s lawyer, Yun Gap-geun, argued: “The CIO does not have the authority to investigate the president for insurrection.”

Charges Against Yoon Suk-yeol

Martial Law Decree and its Fallout

  • On December 3, 2024, Yoon declared martial law, citing threats from “anti-state forces” and opposition obstructionism.
  • His decree plunged South Korea into its worst political crisis in decades, leading to his impeachment by the National Assembly on December 14, 2024, in a 204-85 vote.

Potential Penalties

  • The charges of insurrection and abuse of power carry severe penalties, including life imprisonment or the death penalty.
  • Yoon, as a sitting president, lacks immunity from prosecution in cases involving rebellion or treason.

South Korea’s Political Crisis Deepens

Impeachment and Leadership Void

  • Following Yoon’s suspension, Acting President Han Duck-soo assumed office but was impeached by the opposition-controlled legislature on Friday over his refusal to appoint three Constitutional Court justices.
  • Authority has since passed to Deputy Prime Minister and Finance Minister Choi Sang-mok, who approved two judicial appointments on Tuesday, leaving one vacancy.

Constitutional Court’s Role

  • The Constitutional Court has up to six months to decide whether to uphold Yoon’s impeachment or restore his presidency. At least six of the nine justices must approve the impeachment to remove Yoon permanently.

Defense and Opposition Reactions

Yoon’s Defense

  • Yoon has defended his actions, stating: “The martial law decree was legal and necessary to protect the nation from anti-state threats.”
  • His legal team plans to seek an injunction from the Constitutional Court to invalidate the arrest warrant.

Opposition Criticism

  • The Democratic Party and other opposition factions have accused Yoon of undermining democratic processes and violating human rights through his martial law decree.

What Happens Next?

Arrest and Custody Timeline

  • If arrested, Yoon will become the first sitting president in South Korean history to be taken into custody.
  • Authorities will have 48 hours to decide whether to seek a warrant for his detention or release him.

Impact on Governance

  • The prolonged political instability has raised concerns over governance, with the acting president’s authority limited until the Constitutional Court rules on Yoon’s impeachment.

Source: Al Jazeera


Supreme Court Slams Centre, ED for Misusing PMLA in Bail Cases, Grants Relief to Accused Woman
Legal Wires
Supreme Court Slams Centre, ED for Misusing PMLA in Bail Cases, Grants Relief to Accused Woman
The Supreme Court rebuked the Centre and ED for arguing contrary to PMLA provisions in opposing bail pleas. The Court criticized the government’s intent to deny bail under all circumstances and granted bail to a woman accused, highlighting statutory exceptions under Section 45 of the PMLA.
Taxi Drivers Can’t Be Expected to Know Passenger Details: Supreme Court Acquits Driver in NDPS Case
Legal Wires
Taxi Drivers Can’t Be Expected to Know Passenger Details: Supreme Court Acquits Driver in NDPS Case
The Supreme Court acquitted a taxi driver accused under the NDPS Act, ruling that mere inability to provide passenger details is insufficient for conviction without clear evidence linking him to the contraband.
Rajasthan High Court Grants Interim Bail to Asaram Till March 31, Citing Medical Grounds in 2013 Rape Case
Legal Wires
Rajasthan High Court Grants Interim Bail to Asaram Till March 31, Citing Medical Grounds in 2013 Rape Case
The Rajasthan High Court has granted interim bail to Asaram Bapu, convicted in a 2013 rape case, till March 31, 2025. This follows a similar plea granted by the Supreme Court citing medical grounds.
Or
Powered by Lit Law
New Chat
Sources
No Sources Available
Ask AI