Public Interest at Risk: SC Flags Issues in Loan Sanctions Without Proper Title Verification RBI to Establish Uniform Guidelines

The Supreme Court has raised serious concerns over banks sanctioning loans without conducting adequate title search reports, emphasizing the potential legal and financial risks associated with such practices. The Court highlighted the necessity for the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) and other relevant stakeholders to create a standardized and practical framework to ensure thorough title searches before approving loans. The Court further noted that erring bank officialswho approve loans based on inadequate or faulty title search reports should be held liable, including facing possible criminal action.

Key Observations of the Supreme Court

• The Court stressed that:
  • "Banks should remain very careful with inadequate title clearance reports, more particularly, when such reports are obtained cheaply and at times for external reasons."
  • The issue of loan approvals based on defective reports concerns public money and must be addressed in the larger public interest.
  • The RBI should collaborate with stakeholders to establish a uniform approach for preparing title search reports before sanctioning loans.
  • The liability of bank officers who sanction loans on faulty reports must be determined, potentially leading to criminal proceedings.
  • Standard guidelines must be created regarding fees and costs associated with title search reports to maintain high quality.

Current Regulatory Gaps

• The Court pointed out the absence of a standard mechanism by the RBI to regulate title search reports before loan approvals.
• Currently, banks rely on reports prepared by empaneled lawyers, but there is no uniform standard for their preparation.
• The bench noted that without a standardized process, banks are vulnerable to fraudulent transactions and property disputes, jeopardizing the financial system.

Case Background

• The ruling came in response to a case where a loan was sanctioned by a bank on the basis of a mortgaged property that was later discovered to have title disputes.
• The Supreme Court noted that a robust title search process could have verified ownership, ensured no adverse claims existed, and confirmed the property's clear legal standing.

Bench's Stand

• The bench comprising Justice JB Pardiwala and Justice R Mahadevan underscored the criticality of developing a standardized title search framework to prevent such instances in the future.
• The Court stressed that banks must take proactive steps to protect public funds and ensure compliance with sound financial practices.

Case Title: CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA & ANR. VERSUS SMT. PRABHA JAIN & ORS.

Attachment: