NEWS: Plea in SC seeking Virtual Court Hearing as Fundamental Right

A petition has been filed before the Supreme Court by

NEWS: Plea in SC seeking Virtual Court Hearing as Fundamental Right

A petition has been filed before the Supreme Court by lawyers body challenging the decision of Uttrakhand High Court, terminating the virtual courts and reverting back to physical hearing of cases.

The Plea has been filed by the All India Jurists Association, a body that consists of more than 5,000 lawyers across the country and journalist Sparsh Upadhyay of Livelaw also sought a declaration that the right to participate in court proceedings through virtual courts via video conference is a fundamental right under Article 19(1)(a) and (g) of the Constitution.

The Uttrakhand High Court passed an administrative order through registrar-general reading :

“Hon’ble Court is pleased to direct that the Hon’ble Court will resume normal judicial work only through physical mode w.e.f. 24.08.2021, and no request for virtual hearing will be entertained by the High Court.”

The Plea seeks the declaration of ‘access of virtual courts’ by counsels, clients and journalists as a Fundamental Right available to every lawyer under Article 19(1)(a) and (g) of the Constitution of India.

We live in an age of information and re witness to a technological revolution that pervades almost every aspect of our lives. Redundancies and obsolescence are as ubiquitous as technology itself. Technology is a great enabler. Technology can be harnessed by the State in furthering access to justice and fostering good governance,” the plea stated.

The petition placed reliance on the Supreme Court’s judgment in Anuradha Bhasin v Union of India in which it was held that the right to access to the internet and various applications/websites is a facet of various Fundamental Rights and Freedoms available under Article 19 of the Constitution of India.

I Wish Men Had Menstruation: Supreme Court Slams MP High Court for Dismissing Female Judge Post-Miscarriage
I Wish Men Had Menstruation: Supreme Court Slams MP High Court for Dismissing Female Judge Post-Miscarriage
The Supreme Court criticized MP High Court for dismissing a female judge post-miscarriage, highlighting systemic gender bias and questioning insensitive performance evaluation criteria for women in judiciary.
Discrimination in Women’s Sports? Minnesota Supreme Court Hears Transgender Powerlifter’s Case Under Human Rights Act
Discrimination in Women’s Sports? Minnesota Supreme Court Hears Transgender Powerlifter’s Case Under Human Rights Act
Transgender powerlifter JayCee Cooper challenges exclusion from women’s events in the Minnesota Supreme Court, citing discrimination under the Human Rights Act, sparking debates on inclusion and fairness.
They Have to Be Given a Chance, or Else How Will They Come Up? - Supreme Court Upholds SC Reservation
They Have to Be Given a Chance, or Else How Will They Come Up? - Supreme Court Upholds SC Reservation
The Supreme Court dismissed a plea challenging SC reservation in Gram Panchayat elections in Punjab, reinforcing the rotation principle to ensure representation for marginalized communities.
Powered by Lit Law
New Chat
Sources

Ask Lit Law