Mumbai Court says No Offence if Pedestrian was Hit while Not Using Zebra Crossing

A Magistrate Court in Mumbai observed that pedestrians are not

Mumbai Court says No Offence if Pedestrian was Hit while Not Using Zebra Crossing

A Magistrate Court in Mumbai observed that pedestrians are not supposed to cross the Eastern Express Highway unless there is a zebra crossing while acquitting a 30-year-old biker who was accused of killing a 60-year-old woman while she was crossing the road in the year 2017.

State (Pantnagar Police Station) v. Hemant Nagesh Hatkar

The biker was booked under Sections 279 (rash and negligent act), 304(A) (causing death by negligence) of the Indian Penal Code and for the offence punishable under Section 134(a)(b) of the Motor Vehicle Act.

The court was in view that the accident happened in the middle of the road and there was nothing in the record to show that the victim was using the zebra crossing.

The court noted that the footpath was at 35 feet and the road divider at 15 feet distance from the spot of incident on the Eastern Express Highway. Inferring that the incident had happened in the middle of the road while the victim was crossing the road.

The court remarked that “….It is question of common knowledge that pedestrians are not supposed to cross eastern express highway unless there is zebra crossing.”

The Magistrate further said nothing could connect the biker to the act of ramming into the victim. The informant was not an eyewitness and came after the incident.

“In the circumstance, it is clear that prosecution has failed to establish that accused drove his motor vehicle on a public road in rash and negligent manner endangering human life or personal safety of others and thereby caused death of Mudrika Kamble and also failed to provide her medical assistance and to report the matter to the nearest police station.”

Read Order

"This Country Will Function As Per the Wishes of the Majority”: Justice Yadav’s Controversial Remarks at VHP Event
"This Country Will Function As Per the Wishes of the Majority”: Justice Yadav’s Controversial Remarks at VHP Event
Justice Shekhar Yadav advocates for a Uniform Civil Code and majority rule, but his remarks on gender issues and Muslim practices raise concerns about his understanding of secularism.
Allahabad HC sitting Judge Justice Yadav Talks Uniform Civil Code, Religious Conversion at VHP Event
Allahabad HC sitting Judge Justice Yadav Talks Uniform Civil Code, Religious Conversion at VHP Event
Justice Shekhar Kumar Yadav delivers a lecture on Uniform Civil Code, highlighting its constitutional necessity. The event also discusses Waqf Board Act and religious conversions.
“Secularism Was Not Given Its Due”: Justice Nariman Critiques Supreme Court’s Babri Masjid Verdict
“Secularism Was Not Given Its Due”: Justice Nariman Critiques Supreme Court’s Babri Masjid Verdict
Justice Nariman critiques the Babri Masjid verdict, calling it a travesty of justice for not upholding secularism. He emphasizes the need for tolerance and stronger laws to preserve India’s secularism.
Powered by Lit Law
New Chat
Sources

Ask Lit Law