NEWS: Karnataka HC puts Stay on 25% Domicile Reservation in NLSIU

Karnataka High Court on Tuesday passed an interim order to NLSIU Amendment Act, 2020 passed by the Karnataka State Assembly granting 25% state reservation in NLSIU Bengaluru.

NEWS: Karnataka HC puts Stay on 25% Domicile Reservation in NLSIU

Karnataka High Court on Tuesday passed an interim order to NLSIU Amendment Act, 2020 passed by the Karnataka State Assembly granting 25% state reservation in NLSIU Bengaluru.

Also Court stayed the 5% concession on the Cut-off score in the admission test for the students of Karnataka.

The bench comprising of Justices B V Nagaratha and Ravi Hosmani were in view:

“Bearing in mind issue that arises in petitions and being conscious of interest of students who are aspiring to take admission to the law school we think it proper to pass interim order.

The Court clarified that all admissions to NLSIU will be treated as provisional admissions until the final order.

The Bench said:

“Since we have stayed the impugned amendment we have also stayed the 5% concession. However, NLSIU prepare the list as per the impugned amendment and 5% concession and keep it in a sealed cover and don’t publish it. Publish only the merit list without the amendment.
Join Us as a Campus Ambassador for Legal Wires and Lex Live!
Join Us as a Campus Ambassador for Legal Wires and Lex Live!
Join Us as a Campus Ambassador for Legal Wires & Lex Live! Lead initiatives, build Legal AI Societies, and connect with peers and professionals. https://forms.gle/sFNBHhiquZSGemqw9
"No Suits to Be Registered and No Orders Passed Until Further Directions": Supreme Court Intervenes in Places of Worship Act Case
"No Suits to Be Registered and No Orders Passed Until Further Directions": Supreme Court Intervenes in Places of Worship Act Case
The Supreme Court halts the registration of new suits against places of worship and bars survey orders in pending cases, while hearing petitions challenging the Places of Worship Act, 1991.
"Mere Harassment Not Enough for Suicide Abetment Conviction": Supreme Court Clarifies Legal Standards
"Mere Harassment Not Enough for Suicide Abetment Conviction": Supreme Court Clarifies Legal Standards
The Supreme Court rules that harassment alone isn't enough to convict someone of abetment to suicide. It requires evidence of direct action or incitement by the accused.
Or
Powered by Lit Law
New Chat
Sources

Ask Lit Law