Allahabad HC says Cow should be Declared as National Animal, given Fundamental Rights

The Allahabad High Court while denying bail to the accused

Allahabad HC says Cow should be Declared as National Animal, given Fundamental Rights

The Allahabad High Court while denying bail to the accused charged for offences under the Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act in Uttar Pradesh, observed that the cow is a part and parcel of the culture of India and should be declared a National Animal.

“The work of cow protection is not only of one religious sect, but cow is the culture of India and the work of saving the culture is of every citizen living in the country irrespective of religion,” the Court said.

Javed v. State of Uttar Pradesh

The Single Judge Bench of Justice Shekhar Kumar Yadav said that government should bring a bill in the Parliament to give fundamental rights to cow and to declare it as the national animal. Strict laws should be made to punish those who talk about harming cow.

The Applicant Javed was charged under Sections 3, 5 and 8 of the Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act.

He had applied for bail to which the court denied and remarked that India is the only country in the whole world where people of different religions live, who may worship differently but their thinking is the same for the country.

While the court also stated that if bail is granted to Javed, it might disturb the harmony of the society at large.

This is not the first offence of the applicant, even before this he has committed cow slaughter, which has disturbed the harmony of the society and if released on bail, he will again do the same work which will spoil the harmony in the society. This bail application of the above applicants is baseless and deserves to be rejected. Accordingly, the above bail applications are rejected,” the court said.

Read Order

Join Us as a Campus Ambassador for Legal Wires and Lex Live!
Join Us as a Campus Ambassador for Legal Wires and Lex Live!
Join Us as a Campus Ambassador for Legal Wires & Lex Live! Lead initiatives, build Legal AI Societies, and connect with peers and professionals. https://forms.gle/sFNBHhiquZSGemqw9
"No Suits to Be Registered and No Orders Passed Until Further Directions": Supreme Court Intervenes in Places of Worship Act Case
"No Suits to Be Registered and No Orders Passed Until Further Directions": Supreme Court Intervenes in Places of Worship Act Case
The Supreme Court halts the registration of new suits against places of worship and bars survey orders in pending cases, while hearing petitions challenging the Places of Worship Act, 1991.
"Mere Harassment Not Enough for Suicide Abetment Conviction": Supreme Court Clarifies Legal Standards
"Mere Harassment Not Enough for Suicide Abetment Conviction": Supreme Court Clarifies Legal Standards
The Supreme Court rules that harassment alone isn't enough to convict someone of abetment to suicide. It requires evidence of direct action or incitement by the accused.
Or
Powered by Lit Law
New Chat
Sources

Ask Lit Law