Justice Served: All Six Acquitted in Delhi Riots Case

In a significant ruling, Delhi’s Karkardooma Court has acquitted all six accused in a high-profile case related to the 2020 Delhi riots. The court found insufficient evidence to prove charges of rioting, theft, vandalism, and arson. Defense lawyers, led by Jamiat Ulama-i-Hind, argued successfully th

Justice Served: All Six Acquitted in Delhi Riots Case

In a significant development, Delhi’s Karkardooma Court has acquitted all six accused in a high-profile case related to the 2020 Delhi riots. The accused, Hashim Ali, Abu Bakar, Mohammad Aziz, Rashid Ali, Najmuddin alias Bhola, and Mohammad Danish, faced severe charges including rioting, theft, vandalism, and arson. They were booked under various sections of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) based on FIR No. 72/20 filed at the Karawal Nagar police station.

Defense Representation

  • Jamiat Ulama-i-Hind led the defense under its president, Maulana Mahmood Asad Madani.
  • Advocate Saleem Malik represented Hashim Ali and Rashid Ali.
  • Advocate Shameem Akhtar represented Abu Bakar.
  • Hashim Ali, caretaker of Madina Mosque in Shiv Vihar, had his mosque and home destroyed by rioters, and initially faced charges criticized by the court.

Prosecution Allegations

  • The prosecution alleged that the accused were part of a mob that destroyed Shri Naresh Chand’s property during the riots.
  • Witnesses, including the complainant and his son Umakant, identified the accused based on CCTV footage and other evidence.

Defense Arguments

  • Jamiat Ulama-i-Hind’s lawyers argued there was no direct evidence linking the accused to the crimes.
  • They highlighted the lack of clear identification by witnesses.
  • Stated that CCTV footage and call detail records did not conclusively prove the involvement of the accused.
  • Emphasized that the accused were themselves victims, having lost their mosque and homes in the riots.

Court’s Conclusion

  • The court concluded that no witness could clearly identify the accused from the CCTV footage.
  • Criticized the lack of scientific examination to confirm the accused’s presence in the footage.
  • Ruled that there was insufficient evidence to prove the accused’s involvement in criminal activities, declaring all charges baseless and acquitting them.

Reactions and Statements

  • Maulana Mahmood Asad Madani, president of Jamiat Ulama-i-Hind, expressed happiness over the verdict.
  • Criticized the investigative agencies for failing to deliver justice and identify the true culprits of the Delhi riots.
  • Emphasized the need to uncover the real perpetrators to prevent future anti-national activities.
  • Noted that multiple courts have recognized the shortcomings and criminal negligence of the police and investigative agencies regarding the Delhi riots.

Ongoing Efforts by Jamiat Ulama-i-Hind

  • Jamiat Ulama-i-Hind is handling over 250 cases related to the Delhi riots.
  • Legal aspects are overseen by Advocate Niaz Ahmed Farooqui.
  • Rehabilitation efforts for riot victims are conducted under the supervision of General Secretary Maulana Muhammad Hakimuddin Qasmi.
Gujarat’s Judicial Crisis: 15.61 Lakh Pending Cases and 535 Vacant Judicial Posts
Gujarat’s Judicial Crisis: 15.61 Lakh Pending Cases and 535 Vacant Judicial Posts
Gujarat’s judicial system faces 15.61 lakh pending cases and 535 judicial vacancies. Experts call for urgent reforms to fill positions, improve case management, and reduce delays in justice.
Banned Weapons Used by Israel: International Justice Demanded for Alleged 'Body Vaporization' in Gaza
Banned Weapons Used by Israel: International Justice Demanded for Alleged 'Body Vaporization' in Gaza
Hamas demands an international probe into Israel’s use of banned weapons in Gaza, as death tolls rise. With over 44,000 Palestinians dead, the need for accountability grows.
1988 Murder Case Convict, Aged 103, Granted Freedom by Supreme Court in Rare Move
1988 Murder Case Convict, Aged 103, Granted Freedom by Supreme Court in Rare Move
The Supreme Court ordered the interim release of a 103-year-old convict serving a life sentence for a 1988 murder case, citing the convict's advanced age and humanitarian considerations. Introduction
Powered by Lit Law
New Chat
Sources

Ask Lit Law