The Delhi High Court restrains AGF Finlease India from using 'PhonePey Loan' as the name of its digital lending agency, citing trademark infringement against PhonePe.
In a major trademark dispute, the Delhi High Court has issued an interim injunction restraining AGF Finlease India Limited from using the name 'PhonePey Loan' for its digital lending agency. The Court found the name deceptively similar to the trademark of PhonePe, a payments gateway owned by Walmart.
Court’s Interim Orders
- Justice Mini Pushkarna granted the interim injunction in favor of PhonePe.
- The Court restrained AGF Finlease from selling, offering to sell, or using "Phone Pe," "PhonePey Loan," or any other mark similar to "PhonePe."
- Domain Name Registrar (GoDaddy) was ordered to take down the website "PhonePey Loan."
- Social media platforms, including Facebook and Instagram, were directed to remove posts infringing upon the PhonePe trademark.
Arguments Presented
- PhonePe’s Contention: Advocate Sidharth Chopra, representing PhonePe, argued that "PhonePey Loan" is deceptively similar to "PhonePe," creating confusion among users. He further alleged that agents from AGF Finlease misrepresented themselves as being affiliated with PhonePe’s loan department.
- Defense by AGF Finlease: The company contended that it used the term "PhonePey," not "PhonePe," asserting that the two were distinct. However, the Court found this argument unsatisfactory.
Court’s Observations
- Justice Pushkarna noted: "Prima facie [case] has been made out for grant of injunction. Accordingly, till the next date of hearing, Defendants 1 and 2 are restrained from selling, offering to sell- Phone Pe, PhonePey Loan or any other mark, resulting in infringement of PhonePe mark."
- The Court emphasized that the similarity in branding could lead to confusion, constituting trademark infringement.
Legal Representation
- PhonePe was represented by Shilpa Gupta, Deepika Pokharia, Naman Tandon, and Advocate Sidharth Choprafrom Saikrishna & Associates.
- AGF Finlease’s counsel attempted to defend the usage of "PhonePey," but their arguments were dismissed.
Implications of the Ruling
- The interim injunction highlights the importance of protecting established trademarks from deceptive similarities.
- This decision reinforces the significance of clear branding and the legal ramifications of misrepresentation in the digital marketplace.
Source: CNBC TV18
