Bengaluru Techie Suicide Case: Wife and In-Laws Arrested for Abetment as Evidence and Allegations Unfold

Bengaluru police arrest techie Atul Subhash’s estranged wife, mother-in-law, and brother-in-law for abetment to suicide. Forensic analysis of extensive evidence continues amidst allegations and counterclaims.

Bengaluru Techie Suicide Case: Wife and In-Laws Arrested for Abetment as Evidence and Allegations Unfold

In a tragic case that has garnered widespread attention, Bengaluru police arrested the estranged wifemother-in-law, and brother-in-law of deceased tech executive Atul Subhash on charges of abetment to suicide. The case, which involves allegations of harassment, detailed suicide notes, and a 90-minute video, has exposed deep rifts and conflicting claims. The arrests were made in Gurugram and Allahabad, while a fourth suspect, the wife’s elderly father, remains under investigation. The incident continues to unfold with a thorough police probe and forensic analysis of all seized materials.


  • Arrest of Nikita and Her Family:
    • Bengaluru police arrested Nikita Singhania (29), her mother Nisha Singhania (54), and her brother Anurag Singhania (27).
    • Nikita was apprehended near Hongkong Bazar Road in Gurugram, where she had been staying in a paying guest (PG) accommodation in Phase 2, Rail Vihar.
    • Nisha and Anurag were arrested in Allahabad (Prayagraj) near Hotel Rameshwaram Inn.
    • All three were flown to Bengaluru the same day, arriving at 10:30 p.m., underwent medical tests, and were produced before a magistrate at 5:30 a.m. the following morning. They were subsequently remanded to 14-day judicial custody at Central Prison, Parappana Agrahara.
    • The arrests have led to concerns about the wellbeing of Atul’s 4-year-old son, whose whereabouts remain unknown.
    • Sushil Singhania, Nikita’s 70-year-old father, is named in the First Information Report (FIR), and his role is under verification.

Details of the Suicide and Evidence

  • Suicide Note and Video:
    • Atul Subhash, an automobile executive, left behind a four-page handwritten suicide note and 44 typed pages, totaling 48 pages.
    • 90-minute video was also recorded by Atul, all of which have been seized and are undergoing forensic analysis.
    • The police dismissed rumors about missing evidence, stating: “All documents and devices were seized and presented before the court.”
  • Charges Filed:
    • The police registered a case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) Sections 108 (3) and (5) for abetment to suicide based on a complaint by Atul’s younger brother, Bikas Kumar.

Conflicting Allegations

  • Nikita’s Defense:
    • During interrogation, Nikita denied the allegations, asserting that she was the one who faced harassment. She stated: “If I harassed him for money, why would I stay away from him?”
    • Nikita claimed she had been living apart from Atul for nearly three years.
    • In a 2022 police complaint, she accused Atul of dowry harassment, stating he “treated the marriage like a beast.” She alleged that dowry demands of ₹10 lakh led to her father’s deteriorating health and subsequent death.
  • Atul’s Suicide Note:
    • Atul countered Nikita’s claims in his suicide note, asserting that her allegations of dowry harassment were false. He stated that Nikita’s father’s death was due to a heart-related ailment, not shock caused by dowry demands.

Statements from Police Officials

  • DCP Shivakumar Gunare emphasized the importance of a thorough investigation: “We will investigate the case thoroughly and file a chargesheet in court if the allegations made by Atul are proved.”
  • Police are also examining Atul’s internet search history as part of the investigation. A senior officer commented: “The seized materials will be sent to the forensic sciences laboratory for analysis, and the findings will be submitted to the court.”

Source : India Today and Economic Times

SC Upholds Conviction Under Common Intention: Severity of Injuries Alone Cannot Reduce Punishment
Legal Wires
SC Upholds Conviction Under Common Intention: Severity of Injuries Alone Cannot Reduce Punishment
The Supreme Court ruled that punishment cannot be reduced for individuals acting with common intention merely because the injuries inflicted by them were less severe than those caused by co-accused.
Supreme Court to Decide: Should the Age for Annulment Under PCMA Be 18 or 21 While Addressing Gender Inequality?
Legal Wires
Supreme Court to Decide: Should the Age for Annulment Under PCMA Be 18 or 21 While Addressing Gender Inequality?
The Supreme Court examines whether the age of majority for males under the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act is 18 or 21, determining the limitation period for filing marriage annulment petitions.
Bombay High Court: Limited Evidence Invalidates SC/ST Act Charges in Complex Case
Legal Wires
Bombay High Court: Limited Evidence Invalidates SC/ST Act Charges in Complex Case
The Bombay High Court quashed SC/ST Act charges for most accused, citing lack of evidence, while upholding IPC charges of simple hurt and criminal intimidation for four individuals involved in the case.
Or
Powered by Lit Law
New Chat
Sources
No Sources Available
Ask AI