76 SC lawyers write to CJI to take Suo Moto cognizance of events calling for genocide of Muslims

76 Supreme Court lawyers have sent a letter to Chief

76 SC lawyers write to CJI to take Suo Moto cognizance of events calling for genocide of Muslims

76 Supreme Court lawyers have sent a letter to Chief Justice of India NV Ramana highlighting the two events organized in Delhi on 17th and Hardiwar on 19th of December by the Hindu Yuva Vahini and Yati Narsinghanand respectively, wherein open calls for the genocide of Muslims were made.

The letter has urged the CJI to immediately take suo moto cognizance of the instances and request to take action against the persons guilty, under Section 120B, 121A, 124A, 153A, 153B, 295A and 298 of the Indian Penal Code.

Full text of the letter:

Hon’ble Mr.Justice N.V.Ramana
The Chief Justice of India
Supreme Court of India
Tilak Marg
New Delhi-110001

Subject – Prayer for taking of Suo Moto Cognizance of hate speeches calling for the genocide of Muslims given in Haridwar and Delhi.

This is to bring to your kind notice that between the 17th & 19th of December 2021 at two separate events organized in Delhi (by the Hindu Yuva Vahini) and Haridwar (by Yati Narsinghanand), hate speeches consisting of open calls for genocide of Muslims in order to achieve ethnic cleansing, were made by the following:

1. Yati Narsinghanand Giri
2. Sagar Sindhu Maharaj
3. Dharamdas Maharaj
4. Premanand Maharaj
5. Sadhvi Annapoorna alias Pooja Shakun Pandey
6. Swami Anand Swaroop
7. Ashwani Upadhyay
8. Suresh Chavhanke
9. Swami Prabodhanand Giri

The aforementioned events and the speeches delivered during the same are not mere hate speeches but amount to an open call for murder of an entire community. The said speeches thus, pose a grave threat not just to the unity and integrity of our country but also endanger the lives of millions of Muslim citizens.

In view of the seriousness and gravity of the aforementioned events it is most humbly prayed that Your Lordship may take suo-moto cognizance of the same and direct that action be taken against the guilty persons under Sections 120B, 121A, 153A, 153B, 295A and 298 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

It is also pointed out that the recent speeches are a part of a series of similar speeches that we have come across in the past. It may be noted that no effective steps have been taken under the provisions of 153, 153A, 153B, 295A, 504, 506, 120B, 34 of IPC in respect of the earlier hate speeches. Thus, urgent judicial intervention is required to prevent such events that seem to have become the order of the day. We have also been informed that in this regard a few Petitions under Article 32 of the Constitution of India are also pending for consideration before the Hon’ble Supreme Court.

We are writing to your Lordship hoping for prompt action in your capacity as the head of the judicial wing of the State and knowing your Lordship’s commitment to both the independence of Judiciary as also the constitutional values that are fundamental to the functioning of a multicultural nation such as ours.

Regards

Signatories:

1. Anjana Prakash, Sr.Adv. & Former Judge, High Court of Patna
2. Dushyant Dave, Sr.Adv.
3. Salman Khurshid, Sr.Adv.
4. Prashant Bhushan, Adv.
5. Raju Ramachandran, Sr.Adv.
6. Huzefa Ahmadi, Sr.Adv.
7. C.U.Singh, Sr.Adv.
8. Meenakshi Arora, Sr.Adv.
9. Vrinda Grover, Adv.
10. Harin Raval, Sr.Adv.
11. Siddharth Dave, Sr.Adv.
12.Vibha Makhija, Sr.Adv.
13. Kavin Gulati, Sr.Adv.
14. P.V.Surendranath, Sr.Adv.
15. Basavprabhu Patil, Sr.Adv.
16. Ejaz Maqbool, Adv.
17. Amita Joseph, Adv.
18. Shomona Khanna, Adv.
19. Fuzail Ahmad Ayyubi, Adv.
20. Amit Anand Tiwari, Adv.
21. Shadaan Farasat, Adv.
22. Jagdeep S.Chhokar, Adv.
23. Mohd.Nizamuddin Pasha, Adv.
24. Anuj Prakaash, Adv.
25. Shoeb Alam, Adv.
26. Rajesh Tyagi, Adv.
27. Pyoli, Adv.
28. Kabir Dixit, Adv.
29. Aldanish Rein, Adv.
30. Cheryl D’Souza, Adv.
31. Andleeb Naqvi, Adv.
32. Prerna Chaturvedi, Adv.
33. Nanita Sharma, Adv.
34. Payal Gaikwad, Adv.
35. Ritesh Dhar Dubey, Adv.
36. Shahab Ahmad, Adv.
37. Surya Prakash, Adv.
38. Shashankraj Singh, Adv.
39. Priyanka Shukla, Adv.
40. Shalini Gera, Adv.
41. Aditya Shrivastava, Adv.
42. Afreen, Adv.
43. Subhash Chandran KR, Adv.
44. Rauf Rahim, Adv.
45. Kumaresh Trivedi, Adv.
46. Anas Tanwir, Adv.
47. Tahini Bhushan, Adv.
48. Vinayak Pant, Adv.
49. Sitwat Nabi, Adv.
50.Vinayak Pant, Adv.
51. Abhisht Hela, Adv.
52. Syed Jafar Alam, Adv.
53. Chandresan B.Rao, Adv.
54. Aditya Kumar, Adv.
55. Mani Gupta, Adv.
56. Abhishek N.Tripathi, Adv.
57. Purvish Jitendra Malkan, Adv.
58. Harsh Parashar, Adv.
59. Avani Bansal, Adv.
60. Mishika Singh, Adv.
61. Rukhsana Choudhury, Adv.
62. Lara Jeswani, Adv.
63. Kritika Agarwal, Adv.
64. Talha Salaria, Adv.
65. Surya Rajappan, Adv.
66. Naveen Nagarjuna, Adv.
67. Mohtasim Syed, Adv.
68. Bharathimohan, Adv.
69. Neha Rathi, Adv.
70. Anubha Rastogi, Adv.
71. Madhur Bharatiya, Adv.
72. Vertika Mani Tripathi, Adv.
73. Yogmaya M.G., Adv.
74. Chandrachur Bhattacharyya, Adv.
75. Nayantara Roy, Adv.
76. Jayant Tripathi, Adv.

Supreme Court Stresses Need to Clarify Judgments’ Binding Nature
Legal Wires
Supreme Court Stresses Need to Clarify Judgments’ Binding Nature
The Supreme Court of India emphasized the need to clarify whether judgments are intended to establish binding precedents under Article 141 or resolve specific disputes, urging for cautious and explicit articulation of intent in its rulings.
Minor Can Be Transferee of Immovable Property: Supreme Court Clarifies Legal Position
Legal Wires
Minor Can Be Transferee of Immovable Property: Supreme Court Clarifies Legal Position
The Supreme Court ruled that minors can validly acquire immovable property via a sale deed, as such transfers are not contracts under Section 11 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, and are legally enforceable.
24 Dead, Thousands Displaced as LA Fires Rage On
Legal Wires
24 Dead, Thousands Displaced as LA Fires Rage On
The Los Angeles wildfires have claimed 24 lives, displaced thousands, and destroyed numerous properties. With intensified winds forecasted, firefighting efforts face renewed challenges amid critical fire weather conditions.
Or
Powered by Lit Law
New Chat
Sources
No Sources Available
Ask AI