Copyright protects creators' original works, granting exclusive rights over reproduction, distribution, and public performance. In India, registration under the Copyright Act, 1957 ensures legal protection, ownership, and opportunities for revenue generation.

Copyright infringement occurs when a copyrighted work is used without authorization, violating the owner's exclusive rights. Remedies under the Copyright Act, 1957 include civil, criminal, and administrative measures, ensuring robust legal protection for creators.

Copyright law safeguards creators' rights but raises complexities in ownership and duration. Ownership varies with authorship, work-for-hire, or licensing. Duration ensures protection for 60 years post-creation or an author's life, balancing rights and public access.

The doctrine of fair use balances copyright protection with public interest, enabling transformative uses like criticism, education, and parody. Both U.S. and Indian frameworks ensure creativity thrives while safeguarding creators’ rights against market harm.

The freedom of the press in India, implicit under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution, is vital for democracy. While it empowers open dialogue, it is subject to reasonable restrictions under Article 19(2) to ensure public order, security, and individual rights.

Media law in India governs the regulation of media activities, balancing freedom of expression with necessary restrictions. Its evolution spans from ancient India to the colonial era, culminating in post-independence legislation ensuring responsible media practices.

Advertising intersects with the right to freedom of speech, protected under Article 19(1)(a) of the Indian Constitution. Courts have ruled that commercial speech is fundamental, yet regulations must ensure ethical standards, consumer protection, and balanced freedoms.

The rise of OTT platforms in India has sparked a debate on balancing free expression and societal interests. The IT Rules, 2021, aim to regulate content with a three-tier grievance redressal system, ensuring accountability while addressing concerns over censorship.

This article examines the intricate balance between freedom of speech and judicial authority in India, focusing on contempt of court laws. It highlights the interplay of constitutional rights, judicial powers, and the need for reforms to align with democratic principles.

Parliamentary privileges and freedom of speech are essential to democratic governance. They ensure MPs can perform duties without undue interference. However, these rights must be balanced with accountability to prevent misuse and uphold public trust in democratic institutions.

The Hot News Doctrine protects time-sensitive information like breaking news or live sports updates from unauthorized use. While recognized in the U.S. under cases like NBA v. Motorola, its application in India relies on common law, facing challenges in a digital age.

The evolution of copyright law now includes protection for computer-generated works, though challenges persist, especially with AI-created content. Questions about originality, human authorship, and ownership highlight the need to adapt laws to modern technological realities.

Performers' rights under copyright law recognize the contributions of artists like actors, musicians, and dancers. These rights offer protections against unauthorized use, ensure fair compensation, and uphold moral rights, enhancing their creative and economic interests.

Film censorship in India seeks to balance artistic freedom with societal norms. While the Constitution guarantees freedom of speech, it allows restrictions in the interest of public order, decency, and morality, with the CBFC acting as a regulatory body for this purpose.

The media serves as the fourth pillar of Indian democracy, playing a crucial role in ensuring transparency, accountability, and unbiased reporting, while facing challenges like censorship, bias, and misinformation.

The Doctrine of Lis Pendens, under Section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, prevents property transfers during ongoing litigation. It ensures the disputed property's status remains unchanged, protecting litigants' rights and upholding judicial authority.

The Doctrine of Part Performance, under Section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, protects transferees who act in good faith on an unregistered property agreement. It ensures fairness by barring transferors from denying rights after part performance of the contract.

An ostensible owner appears as the true owner with the real owner's consent but lacks actual ownership. Under Section 41 of the Transfer of Property Act, a good-faith purchaser relying on such ownership may acquire valid title, overriding the real owner's rights.

Religious conversion under Muslim law affects inheritance, marriage, maintenance, and guardianship. Apostasy dissolves a husband’s marriage, while a wife must seek divorce. Converts gain inheritance rights under Muslim law but lose them from non-Muslim relatives, balancing faith and legal status.

Censorship in India balances freedom of expression with societal harmony. It spans print, electronic, and digital media through laws like the Cinematograph Act and IT Rules, 2021. While it aims to uphold public order, concerns remain over its potential misuse and impact on creativity.

Islamic inheritance law, rooted in Quranic principles, ensures structured asset distribution among heirs, emphasizing tenants-in-common rights. Differences exist in Sunni and Shia laws, including doctrines like Radd and Aul.

Compelled speech in India challenges the balance between freedom of expression under Article 19(1)(a) and state-imposed mandates. Courts cautiously limit such mandates to public interest under Article 19(2).

The doctrine of lis pendens, under Section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, prevents property transfers during litigation to safeguard legal proceedings and maintain the disputed property's status quo.

Yellow journalism in India reflects sensationalism aimed at profits, often infringing on rights. While traditional media follows ethics, new media amplifies misinformation, requiring regulatory frameworks.

Sting operations are key investigative tools that expose corruption but often clash with privacy rights. Balancing freedom of the press with ethical limits raises significant legal and moral questions in India.